![]() ![]() ![]() 30 Grant Gibson, 'China Design Now', Crafts Magazine, no. I can't really comment on Dragon Magazines, though, since I own exactly zero issues of it.Īctually, that's probably not true, since I signed up for 3 months of D&DI a couple of months ago none of that's for 3.5 though. 22 Stacey Duff, 'The dragon's new pose', Time Out English, March 2008: 21. It simply has by far the highest density of broken crap of any other three books published by WotC, and the PHB has more imbalance within itself than probably any two other books. Devil in the Grove: Thurgood Marshall, the Groveland Boys, and the Dawn of a New America. Probably kind of big to include the entire Monster Manual, but even if you restricted the Wildshape thing to a much smaller list (a la the Animal Companions), and only had stats on those creatures, the Druid would be doing rather well, don't you think?įine, though - you're right, Core does not have a monopoly on stupid broken crap (you didn't even get into the Cancer Mage, Planar Shepherd, or worse, Illithid Savant and Beholder Mage, which incidentally are in the same book). A book that had only Core's races, feats, spells, items, and monsters, as opposed to dozens of rules about what you're supposed to do with them, could be one book. A Druid without the MM I'll give you, except that's unfair - Core is a set, and has a lot more rules than just the classes. A Wizard really doesn't rely on crafting much at all, so that's an overstatement, IMO. ![]() Wizard whitout DMG can't craft stuff wich really cuts down his power. Druid whitout a MM isn't that bad (no wildshape, no animal companion, no summons). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |